Author Archives: Steve

Can We Trust The Chinese? History Says No.

One of the downsides of outsourcing manufacturing to China is that you’re a day’s trip away or more from your home USA base just to see what’s going on in the boardroom. The other yet bigger downside is that you’re handing your technology to a country known for stealing intellectual property.

The PC industry has been through this before. It was only a decade ago that US firms such as Gateway, Compaq, and Hewlett-Packard were dominant players in PCs, now they’ve since been replaced by Chinese firms Lenovo and Asus. These competitors now dominating the industry were built from outsourcing to China since we gave them the knowledge and technology on a silver platter to knock-off.

Samsung is the latest example of this since it builds many of the key components for the iPhone and iPad. Therefore, its no coincidence that Samsung is able to build similar quality products that are now Apple’s competition. Now, word is that China based Foxconn is building a smartphone for Amazon.

I think Apple sees the writing on the wall although it may be too late for Apple to begin moving production to the U.S. to avoid what awaits them in about five years from all the technology they exported to a den of thieves known as The People’s Republic Of China.

Gun Prices Surging – Its Guns Gone Wild

President Barack Obama endorsing sweeping gun restrictions in the wake of the school shootings in Newtown, Connecticut, prices for handgun magazines are surging on EBay (EBAY) and semi-automatic rifles are sold out at many Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (WMT) locations.

Wal-Mart, the world’s largest retailer, said yesterday that it would continue to sell guns, including rifles like the one used at Newtown, where 26 people, most of them children, were killed on Dec. 14. By contrast, Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc. (DKS)suspended sales of similar guns at its more than 500 stores.

Searches of five kinds of semi-automatic rifles on Wal- Mart’s website showed them to be out of stock at stores in five states, including Pennsylvania, Kansas and Alabama. Wal-Mart doesn’t sell guns online, instead asking customers to input a zip code to see if their local store carries a specific weapon.

“We remain dedicated to the safe and responsible sale of firearms in areas of the country where they are sold,” David Tovar, a spokesman for Wal-Mart, said yesterday. He didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on this story.

Wal-Mart has about 10 modern sporting rifles, the gun industry’s term for firearms that look like an M-16 military rifle, listed on its website. The retailer removed a description and picture of the Bushmaster AR-15, which was the model used in Newtown, after the shootings.

Assault Rife Sold In Walmary As A Sporting Rifle

In 2006, Wal-Mart reduced the number and variety of guns it offered in stores, and replaced them with more upscale products such as exercise equipment. It then reintroduced firearms to many stores in April 2011 as part of strategy to add merchandise back to shelves and revive sales growth at its Wal-Mart locations in the U.S.

Gun Revenue

The move may have helped as U.S. Wal-Mart stores posted their first gain in same-store sales in more than two years in October 2011. Wal-Mart doesn’t disclose how many guns it sells, though at an analysts’ meeting in October it said gun revenue gained 76 percent in the first half of this fiscal year. The chain advertised a Sig Sauer M400 as one of its Black Friday doorbusters last month, offering the rifle for $50 off at $867.

Cabela’s Inc., an outdoor retailer that also sells guns, didn’t return several calls seeking comment on whether it planned to change its firearm policies. Hunting equipment, which includes firearms, made up 41 percent of Cabela’s sales in 2011, according to a company filing. The retailer doesn’t provide sales data for just guns.

Prices Tripling

On EBay Inc.’s auction website, shoppers have recently bid up gun magazines. The current bid for four Glock handgun magazines, ammunition for one of the guns used at Newtown, is $118.37 compared with $45 on the day before the shooting. The bid for seven Glock magazines hit $201 on Dec. 17 from $71.01 before the massacre.

Gun buyers have flooded other firearms retailers too. The Hyatt Gun Shop in Charlotte, North Carolina, racked up more than $1 million in sales yesterday for the best single-day performance since the store opened in 1959, according to Justin Anderson, director of online sales. At the top of shoppers’ lists was the Bushmaster AR-15, the model of rifle used at Newtown that sells for as much as $4,000 and had almost sold out, he said.

Revenue at one of the largest U.S. gun stores surpassed even the spike just after Obama was elected president in 2008, Anderson said in a telephone interview. Sales weren’t as robust when Obama was re-elected last month because the president hadn’t backed major new gun laws, he said.

Concrete Proposals

Today, Obama said his administration would come up with “concrete proposals” by next month to curb gun violence.

Speculation over stricter gun laws will continue to boost sales, Anderson said yesterday.

“It’s kind of the perfect storm for the gun industry,” he said. “When these things happen, even though it’s sad, it does pick up sales.”

Wal-Mart has received some pressure to curb gun sales in the past. That continued this week when Lauren Buglino, a fourth-grade teacher from the Bronx, created an online petition on Change.org exhorting the retailer to stop selling rifles like the one used at Newtown. It had more than 57,000 supporters today.

Wal-Mart entered into an agreement in 2008 with the Mayors Against Illegal Guns that included video recording of purchases and the use of databases to identify people who have bought guns recovered in crimes.

When Wal-Mart added guns to stores in 2011, Mayor Thomas Menino of Boston criticized it for trying to increase the number of guns on the streets, according to the Boston Herald.

Source Bloomberg

Computers Will Eventually Taste, Touch, Smell And More

Some day in the not too distant future, you’ll be able to order a wedding dress on your tablet and feel the fabric and the veil just by touching the screen.

When you feel an object, your brain registers the series of vibrations on your skin as being smooth, rough, sharp, etc. Computer sensors are becoming sophisticated enough to do that too.

Within the next five years, vibrators within smartphones will be precise enough that they could be designed to mimic the vibrations experienced when your fingers touch a particular surface. Even though you’ll just be touching glass, it will feel like you’re touching whatever object is displayed on the screen.

“We’re not talking about fuzzy screens,” said Bernie Meyerson, IBM’s vice president of innovation. “You’re not going to have to dry clean your Samsung.”

In some ways, computers are already simulating touch — albeit in a crude form. When you’re driving a car in a video game, the controller vibrates when the car starts to veer off the road. It may not feel precisely like a steering wheel’s vibrations when you hit gravel, but within five years, that technology is expected to become even more lifelike.

IBM’s researchers are working on just that — creating applications for the retail and healthcare sectors that use haptic, infrared or pressure-sensitive technologies to simulate touch.

Today’s computers are very good at capturing and displaying images, but despite advances in image recognition software, computers are still pretty lousy at understanding what they’re “looking” at. Humans are still needed to tag friends, label photos and identify diseases.

In five years, all that will change, IBM says. Computers will be able to interpret images better than we can, analyzing colors, texture patterns and gaining insights from other visual media. They will even surpass doctors’ abilities to read medical imagery, including MRIs, CT scans, X-Rays and ultrasounds.

Computers of the not-too-distant future will be able to see subtleties in images that can be invisible to the human eye. For instance, computers will be able to quickly differentiate healthy from diseased tissue on an MRI and cross-reference the image with a patient’s medical history and scientific literature to make a diagnosis.

Imagine holding a smartphone up to your infant when she’s making a sound, and the app displaying a message: “I’m hungry.” That’s not as far-off as you might think.

In five years, computers will be able to detect elements of sounds that humans can hear but aren’t able to understand. As every parent knows, the difference between normal babbling and a message that something is wrong can be extremely subtle. Computers of the near-future will not only be able to detect whether a baby is upset, they’ll be able to determine if the child is hungry, tired, hot or in pain.

By interpreting different sound pressures, vibrations and waves, computers will be able to predict when trees are about to fall, when landslides are imminent, or when cars are about to collide before humans can.

Computers are already starting to do this: In Galway Bay, Ireland, IBM researchers are capturing underwater noise levels to understand the impact that different sounds have on sea life.

Within the next five years, a computer will help you make the perfect recipe — not too sweet, not too salty, not too crunchy, but just the way you like it.

By breaking down foods to the molecular level, computers will be able to use complex algorithms to determine what flavor combinations are the most appealing. They could then develop recipes that provide the ideal flavor and texture of food. Think of it as the Watson of Top Chef.

The technology could be used to help people eat better, IBM says. By making healthy foods taste better, people might crave vegetable dishes instead of sugary and fatty junk foods.

Though computers aren’t quite there yet, they are “tasting” things today. Specially designed microchips are being used in chemical and power plants to sense biohazards in the air. IBM researchers are working to adapt that technology to analyze the chemical structures in food.

Do you think you’re coming down with a cold? In five years, you’ll be able to breathe into your smartphone to find out.

IBM researchers are developing technology to analyze odors in people’s breath that identify ailments, including liver and kidney disorders, asthma, diabetes and epilepsy. By determining which odors and molecules in a person’s breath are associated with each disease, computers of the future will be able to make an instant analysis for problems that today could be misdiagnosed or go undetected by a doctor.

Computers will also be able to detect harmful bacteria that cause Staph infections in hospitals just by smelling the surroundings.

In a more rudimentary form, computers are smelling things now: Agricultural sensors smell soil to determine crop conditions, sensors in museums determine which gas levels are ideal to preserve paintings, and city sanitation departments use computers that can smell garbage and pollution to alert workers when conditions are getting dangerous.

Software To Up-Sample Images

One vital fact to keep in mind regarding software to increase image size is they function more effectively when the original is of “borderline acceptable quality” to begin with.  This is fact when using software from firms like Alien Skin or the image resizing filters of my program UltraSeps which is engineered for t-shirt screen printing.

Many seem to think these software packages can take a miniscule 3″, 72 dpi graphic lifted from a website to generate a pristine 15″ 300 dpi image, ready for print production when that’s simply not the case. I run into this everyday and need to explain the dynamics of up-sampling to end-users.

Lets use a sign printer as an example, he’s probably using it up-sample images for large format printing. I would imagine his originals aren’t small website graphics and are probably somewhat acceptable as a full size t-shirt graphic for example (12″x12″ at 300 dpi) when factoring in physical dimension and resolution. Therefore, when up-sizing for large format such as a vehicle wrap, they work since this type of output is at lower resolution, well below 300 dpi as its viewed from a distance.

Although this won’t sound incredibly scientific — up-sampling, re-sizing, whatever works well “at times” and some files are more forgiving than others. Its not an exact science.

Note:  The up-sampling filters included with my product UltraSeps is engineered for t-shirt graphics and is not intended for print production such as commercial magazine printing.

Is There A Downside To Technology?

I originally wrote this piece for another blog I published during 2010.

Lately within an economy that remains somewhat weak with challenged employment, most publicly traded companies have reported solid earnings and have guided profit forecasts somewhat higher, especially the technology sector. This phenomena is out of sync with what’s occurring on main street and on a global basis.

Its not as though the consumer is banging down the doors to spend, is it? Businesses aren’t suddenly bleeding their wallets to increase capital expenditures, are they? Could it be banks lending again with reckless abandon? No, I think not. Is it possible that technology is getting to the level where enterprises can do more with fewer warm bodies collecting a paycheck thus boosting their bottom line?  Yes…could be!

Although not an absolute, it is having an impact and is never discussed or even pondered within mainstream media. Face facts, where we once had an army of welders at an automobile plant, we now have several fast robots. At offices that once required a team of clerks and assistants, we now have wicked computers doing all that filing, sorting, billing and such. Oh, did I forget to account for a massive decline in domestic manufacturing? Let’s not discard that little tidbit. I could go on and on but I think you get the drift.

Mind boggling advances in technology have been taking place while the population of the USA has exploded over the past 30 years from 225 million to 305 million and these numbers don’t account for the millions of people in the country illegally. So it stands to reason that if technology is allowing many tasks to be completed with 10 people that once required 50, and all during the time population has increased and manufacturing has decreased, we’ll eventually get to the point where jobs, (at least worthwhile employment) can prove difficult to secure. Yes, a theory albeit a good one.

The next 10 years will be interesting unless we can all figure out a way to make a living texting one another, updating our Facebook account and posting to Twitter.

Russia Shoots Down Apple’s iPad Patent

Apple’s efforts to be granted patents in Russia for the design of its iPad has been rejected.  Finally somebody gets it right!   Russia’s Chamber for Patent Disputes, which handles decisions made by the Russian Patent Department, rejected Apple’s attempt to score a patent on the iPad’s basic design, claiming that the features Apple wished to patent are not original nor inventive and deserving of a design patent. Apple’s bad luck, or more likely, lack of political influence in Russia stands in stark contrast to its habitual victories in the American patent office, where it was recently granted a patent on the same “innovative” design aspects.

Apple had actually tried to argue that rounded corners, a flat surface, and slightly round button under the screen were “innovative distinctive features” meant to distance itself from competitors!.” The iPad maker had initially filed its design patent application two years ago, only to have it rejected by the Russian Patent Office in April of this year.

In rejecting Apple’s move for an appeal, the Chamber for Patent Disputes said that Apple’s design was “traditional for modern communication devices, manufactured by different vendors.” The specific aspects of Apple’s design, it said, were “inconspicuous differences in dimensions, screen size, and buttons layout” and were “not essential distinction criteria.”

The most amazing snippet here is that Apple really does hold a patent for rounded corners, a flat surface and a rounded bottom in the USA.  I also remember reading they were granted a patent for a rectangular shaped object.  Maybe I should apply for a patent on a perfectly round object and start suing everyone who makes a ball?

Greedy Google Attacked By Microsoft

Microsoft is trying to reveal Google to the world as a greedy, agenda filled, intensely profit orientated holiday shopping guide in its latest attempt to divert more traffic to its Bing search engine.  But in reality, this is actually true.

The smear tactics start with a marketing campaign focused on a recent change in how Google runs the part of its search engine devoted to “paid” shopping results. The revisions require merchants to pay Google to have their products listed in the shopping section.

In its new ads, Microsoft Corp. contends the new approach betrays Google Inc.’s longstanding commitment to provide the most trustworthy results on the Web, even if it means foregoing revenue.

Google defends the fee-based approach as a way to encourage merchants to provide more comprehensive and accurate information about what they’re selling.

To me, it appears that Google is out to satisfy one entity, and that’s Google.

Top Reasons To Return Your iPad

A Windows Lovers Guide:  “”Top Reasons To Return My iPad”

1- The edges are too smooth and curvy. It also feels too fragile and slippery and I’m afraid I’ll drop it. Somewhat more squarish edges would be better.

2- It has a lot of apps, but doesn’t have the one that I need, use and rely upon all day….Microsoft Office.

3- I can’t watch flash videos which is a major suck factor. Yes, HTML5 is the new big thing, but most of the internet still uses Adobe Flash for video viewing and that’s a fact, jack.

4- No expandable storage!  What’s up with that?  Much unlike the new Microsoft Surface, which has a microSD slot for expandable storage.

5- No USB ports!  Also unlike the Microsoft Surface. I can’t connect it to things such as printers which is very frustrating.

6- No Live Tiles. I have to actually open an app to view something as basic as the temperature. Holy Cow!!! The Surface has Live Tiles which update in real-time that I can see immediately. Why doesn’t innovative and inventive Apple have this?

So sure,  the iPad is nice.  But the Microsoft Surface is much more functional and can actually operate like a real computer or a tablet. The iPad can’t come remotely close to matching that.  Who woulda thunk it?

Signed,
Bill Gates

Android: Is It Too Hard To Use?

In just three years, Android has done nicely killing the smartphone competition.  But if Android is this dominant with respect to market share, why did Apple’s iOS powered devices destroy Android when it came to Thanksgiving and Black Friday shopping?

Some try to lay the blame on the users themselves, by suggesting that iOS users have more cash to spare, or that they are more apt to spend money on their smartphone or tablet toys because there are fewer free apps in the Apple App Store than in the Google Play store.  These are all valid points.

The primary difference however is that Apple’s iOS is easier to use than Android, at least according to my wife and daughter.  So, can the reason for this be that Apple has such tight control over the user experience?  Maybe.   Also, is Google’s Android just too hard for the average user to figure out aside from using it as a phone and texting toy?  This may also be the case for a large percentage of users.

Let’s face it, from the outside there’s little to separate one black rectangle from another other than screen size when in the hands of an experienced user.  What separates them from each other is not how they look, but how they work, and even if more people are buying Android devices than iOS devices, more Apple iOS users are using them to do actual things like shopping, using Facebook, paying bills, etc.

This would tend to suggest that the core difference between iOS and Android is that owners are more inclined to look at an iOS device, whether it be an iPhone or an iPad as a tool to get things done. Android users aren’t getting as far as clicking on the browser, because if they did, the experience from that point onward is not that different to the iOS experience.

This would suggest that Google is facing a problem. People are buying Android-powered smartphones and tablets, but there are barriers or obstacles that gets in the way of engagement that aren’t present in Apple’s iOS platform.

Most of this is undoubtedly down to end-user education. Apple has spent a lot of time and money creating commercials that show its products being used to solve real-world problems. As short and as simple as these ads may be, they give owners, and potential owners an idea of what the iPhone or iPad can do. That might seem quite basic, but it gets people to explore the potential of their Apple devices.

Compare this to ads for Android hardware,  such as those by Samsung which seem to dwell on the device itself rather that what it can do for the user.

In conclusion, when a new user charges up their new iPhone, within an hour or so they’re fairly comfortable with it and are already performing advanced functions.  With Android, it normally takes days to get accustomed to the phone and many times that’s where it stops.

Although this short article seems to be pro-Apple iOS, I personally prefer the Android as I tend to like to customize the user experience to a level not possible with iOS and also enjoy the larger screen on my Galaxy Nexus and its excellent hot spot integration with other devices such as my wifi only iPad.

Sony Releases Gigantic Tablet Computer

Sony, once the king of electronics which recently announced that it would lay off 2,000 employees by the end of this year, has unveiled the VAIO tablet PC with a 20-inch screen, weighing in at a bone breaking 11 pounds. The “mobile desktop” to use the term lightly employs Windows 8, although the fact that it contains only two hours of battery power puts an extreme limit on its portability.

Advertised as a computer for the whole family to use, the base model is priced at almost $900 which is big money when compared to smaller tablets like Apple’s$399 iPad 2 (and soon to be $399 iPad 3) along with the yet to be proven Microsoft’s$499 Surface Tablet.

Sony isn’t using the VAIO tablet to compete in the crowded tablet market; they’re trying to create a new market. This unconventional move also lies in stark contrast to Google’s slender, 10-inch tablet to be announced at its Android event later this month.

At such a high price and weak in functionality, it seems unlikely that Sony will be able to market the monstrous tabletop PC as a legitimate alternative to a desktop system. At a certain point,  bigger just isn’t better, its just bigger.  Sony should gave made the tablet a shade of green and used the moniker “Green Giant”.